On Mon, 31 May 2004 01:37:09 +0900, Kirk Haines <khaines / enigo.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 31 May 2004 01:10:27 +0900, Shannon Fang wrote
> 
> > 2) The application may be hosted on a shared server provided by a
> > hosting company, in this case, I think the most appropriate option
> > might be PHP, because there aren't any hosting company offering
> > mod_ruby etc, as far as I know. However,
> 
> If there seemed to be a demand for it, I would consider it.  However,
> mod_ruby presents a can of worms for a hosting company, so it is no suprise
> that it is a hard feature to find on shared servers.

http://rootr.net/ruby.html