< :the previous in number  ^ :the list in numerical order  > :the next in number  P :the previous (in thread)  N :the next artilce (have the same parent) |<:the top of this thread >|:the next thread  ^ :the parent (reply-to) _:the child (an article replying to this) >:the elder article having the same parent <:the youger article having the same parent ---:split window and show thread lists  | :split window (vertically) and show thread lists  ~ :close the thread frame .:the index ..:the index of indices

Subject: Re: Test::Unit: assert_follows_spec() (or something like that)
From: Guillaume Marcais <guslist@ e f
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 21:24:31 +0900
References: 101745 101753 101759 101779 101786 101790
In-reply-to: 101790

assert_matrix?

Guillaume.

Le 29 mai 04, ? 21:33, Its Me a ?crit :

> assert_cases?
>
> assert_test_cases?
>
>
> "Jim Weirich" <jim / weirichhouse.org> wrote in message
> news:40B9199D.8010108 / weirichhouse.org...
>> David Garamond wrote:
>>>> assert_array(expected, :func)
>>>> assert_inout(expected, :func)
>>>
>>> Both are better than assert_follows_spec I think :)
>>
>> How about:  assert_examples
>
>
>