ts wrote:

> F> Yay, finally we'll be able to use define_method() everywhere where we 
> F> would use def instead.
> 
>  No, and this was your error in [ruby-talk:99984]

What kind of error are you talking about exactly? The code seems to work 
fine for me.

Currently it can't be done without an additional def (because blocks 
don't have block argument slots yet), but it looks as if this would soon 
be changed.