"rolo" <rohitlodha / hotwireindia.com> writes:

> let me reword it to "source accessible license".
>
> I think all the other point except point one ( maybe the most
> important one for diehards) is okay.

Well, depending on the situation, since you are the copyright holder
of all of your code (or are you?), you have the option of
dual-licensing...i.e. by default it's GPL, but for a fee a customer
would be allowed to distribute w/o releasing source code.

Something like the following:

http://www.sleepycat.com/download/licensinginfo.shtml

-- 
Josh Huber