on reading it fine print ( I am not a lawyer) I find point one is also
aceptable. It does not say right to free redistribution of copies. so all
the ten is acceptable.

rolo

-----Original Message-----
From: rolo [mailto:rohitlodha / hotwireindia.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 1:28 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: vuby - VM for Ruby


> From: rolo [mailto:rohitlodha / hotwireindia.com]
> Subject: vuby - VM for Ruby

> About license I feel it should not be GPL but an open source
> application
> which will if bought give you right to modify but not copy.
> If you wish to
> creates n copies you should buy n licenses.

This definitely isn't an open-source license. Check out
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php


let me reword it to "source accessible license".

I think all the other point except point one ( maybe the most important one
for diehards) is okay.

rolo