On Wed, 19 May 2004, Tim Hunter wrote:

> On Tue, 18 May 2004 21:04:26 -0600, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> 
> > yes.  this worries me - it's as if the ImageMagick binding to the jasper
> > lib is incorrectly dealing with compression/quality...  as i said before,
> > the jasper binary handled perfectly and i get ZERO differences when
> > comparing the bands of a tiff image and one converted via
> > tifftopnm/jasper...
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is almost certainly an IM<->jasper issue. I'll be glad to send
> your question to the ImageMagick developers this afternoon. I'll let you
> know what I find out.

thanks alot tim.

-a
-- 
===============================================================================
| EMAIL   :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| PHONE   :: 303.497.6469
| ADDRESS :: E/GC2 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328
| URL     :: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/
| "640K ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981
===============================================================================