On Saturday, 15 May 2004 at  3:38:52 +0900, Phil Tomson wrote:
> In article <40A431B3.9060504 / yahoo.com>,
> Michael campbell  <michael_s_campbell / yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Jim Freeze wrote:
> >
> >> Matz has also said that you shouldn't write an OO language in an OO
> >> language.
> >
> >Why not?
> >
> 
> Maybe because the differences between the two object systems can get to be 
> confusing as you're trying to implement a different object system on top 
> of another one.  

Yes

-- 
Jim Freeze