On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:38:52 +0900, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net> wrote:

> OTOH, you usually don't subclass String because there's so many places
> that create strings that you don't control (i.e #to_s etc.).

If you have some string representing something sepcial, it's more OOP
to subclass, but the easiest way is to extend class String.
namespaces would be really good solution for that.

-- 
Matthias Georgi
matti_g / gmx.de