Hi!

Can I conclude by r28543 and the unclear google translation below that
the change for respond_to? has been accepted? If so I will gladly
adapt the specs for 1.9.3+

Thanks
--
Marc-Andr
2010/7/5 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz / ruby-lang.org>:
|>> Oh, yes. protected against respond_to? that returns true
|>> It is that a false unity.
|>
|> I have a vacant lot between, what about this.

I do not think good.

| Rubyspec This now gives an error like the following.
| # Marc-andre Maybe it will fix it

I'm sure will again.