Issue #16776 has been updated by deivid (David Rodr=EDguez).


I see.

It's a severe as "I can no longer track code coverage on my library that ma=
kes heavy use of TracePoint" is considered.

----------------------------------------
Bug #16776: Regression in coverage library
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16776#change-85034

* Author: deivid (David Rodr=EDguez)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Hi!

I noticed a regression in the coverage library. I tried to write a minimal =
program to show it, hopefully it gives some clues or where the issue might =
lie.

In ruby 2.5.8 and earlier, the following program would print `{:lines=3D>[1=
, 1, nil]}`, showing that the body of the "foo" method was run once. Howeve=
r, on newer rubies, it prints `{:lines=3D>[1, 0, nil]}`, which is incorrect=
 because the "foo" method body has actually been run once.

This is the repro script:

```ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true

require "coverage"
Coverage.start(lines: true)

code =3D <<~RUBY
  def foo
    "LOL"
  end
RUBY

File.open("foo.rb", "w") { |f| f.write(code) }

require_relative "foo"

TracePoint.new(:line) do |_tp|
  foo
end.enable do
  sleep 0
end

res =3D Coverage.result
puts res[File.expand_path("foo.rb")]
```




-- =

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=3Dunsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>