Issue #16746 has been updated by retro (Josef imnek).


> I'd like to experiment with this new syntax. We may find drawbacks in the future, but to find them, we need to experiment first.

If this was merged as an experiment, shouldn't it raise warning on usage (same as pattern matching does)?

----------------------------------------
Feature #16746: Endless method definition
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16746#change-85005

* Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
----------------------------------------
Ruby syntax is full of "end"s.  I'm paranoid that the ends end Ruby.  I hope Ruby is endless.

So, I'd like to propose a new method definition syntax.

```ruby
def: value(args) = expression
```

As you see, there is no "end".

Examples.

```ruby
def: hello(name) =
  puts("Hello, #{ name }")

hello("endless Ruby") #=> Hello, endless Ruby
```

```ruby
def: inc(x) = x + 1

p inc(42) #=> 43
```

```ruby
x = Object.new

def: x.foo = "FOO"

p x.foo #=> "FOO"
```

```ruby
def: fib(x) =
  x < 2 ? x : fib(x-1) + fib(x-2)

p fib(10) #=> 55
```

Limitations.

* `def: foo x = x` is invalid; the parentheses for formal arguments are mandatory.
* `private def: foo = x` is invalid; this method definition cannot be an method argument.

A patch is attached.  No conflicts.

---Files--------------------------------
endless-method-definition.patch (2.47 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>