> Choice (2) was based on so-called "Denver Accord". Meanwhile matz
> expressed his opinion being (1).
> Things are not fixed yet and (I think) should not until debates made on
> this ML. So I want you to tell us your opinion.
Since 1.9.1 is planned for Christmas *2007*, choice (2) would make *no* 
improvements for more than 1 year. It is very long time for a feature freeze 
IMO.
-- 
Sylvain