Issue #15761 has been updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler).


Agree that it is confusing.

In my opinion, if it were easily possible so, it would be best to have only one
central repository including the documentation, e. g. something like
doc.ruby-lang.org or a sub-page like that.

As it is right now, when I search for documentation (via google usually),
and don't specify anything else, I also find old ruby versions first,
which is not a huge problem but a bit annoying.

----------------------------------------
Bug #15761: File::Statfs documentation still exists on ruby-doc.org/core-trunk/
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15761#change-77570

* Author: albb0920 (Albert Song)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
* ruby -v: 
* Backport: 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Hi

I found File::Statfs still exists in core-trunk web documentation.
But this feature no longer exists.

http://ruby-doc.org/core-trunk/File/Statfs.html

Google search leads me to this page, which is a bit confusing.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>