On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:09:15AM +0900, nobu.nokada / softhome.net wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Sun, 2 Mar 2003 03:55:37 +0900,
> Mauricio Fern?ndez wrote:
> > Why isn't that in use right now?
> > You can argue that -funroll-loops does the same, but a lot of people are
> > using the binary supplied by their vendor, compiled without "strange"
> > options...
> 
> Just it has not been considered necessary yet, I guess.

If it's faster and simple enough, it's good, isn't it?
Several small speed increments even by a couple % can add up to a real
difference...

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

We apologize for the inconvenience, but we'd still like yout to test out
this kernel. 
	-- Linus Torvalds, announcing another kernel patch