nobu / ruby-lang.org wrote:
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15305#change-74878

> LGTM.
> It might be a result by trial&error.

OK, r65744

Any comment about the atomics in rb_free_tmp_buffer?  Thanks.

> I also don't get the point of using atomics in rb_free_tmp_buffer;
> but that's a separate issue...

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>