Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-08-16 02:30]:
>> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-08-11 00:39]:
>>> In ruby-core:4326
>>> (http://marc.10east.com/?l=ruby-core&m=110691458204738&w=2)
>>> a patch was posted to make RDoc work with extensions that are spread
>>> across multiple C files. The problem is, that if module Foo is defined
>>> in file a.c, rdoc will have forgotten about the module when it handles
>>> file b.c. The patch fixes that problem.
>> Ping? Who's maintaining RDoc these days?
> 
> Ping 2, would someone _please_ realize that this is actually a problem
> for some people?

The tracker statistics on RubyForge are not very encouraging. Of the 108 
bugs open today, 98 (90%) are unassigned. Of those, 82 (83%) are older 
than 90 days.

To be fair, there are around 130 closed bugs (RubyForge doesn't let 
non-admins run reports), a significant number of which were closed 
without being assigned. So assignment is not necessarily a prerequisite 
for action, though it should be.

The bottom line, however, is that a large number of bug reports (some 
with patches, including yours and mine), go ignored.

Steve