chopraanmol1 / gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, it can be further optimized for keyword argument and argument setup for the block. I'll modify the patch in a day or two. 

Cool!  It's probably worth implementing something like
rb_ary_shift_m (but without the return value) to avoid looping
on rb_ary_shift.

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>