ko1 / atdot.net wrote:
> On last comment, I thought these counters are not reset forever.
> (because I searched only `= 0` lines)

OK.  Also, did we ever consider signed type (`ssize_t`) for malloc
counters instead?  This may be more useful if we switch to
thread-local storage for counters to avoid atomics.

Probably won't be online much the next few days.

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>