On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:14:33AM +0900, Charles O Nutter wrote:
> Actually, if you're using your own timers, you'd just need a good way to
> receive that signal and add in your own scheduling hook. That could be done
> in a similar way to the current threading signal, so it might not be
> necessary to actually start up the thread scheduler itself.

Okay, well, I'll try the watchdog thread and SIGALRM (my own timer) ideas.

Thanks be to Charles O. Nutter and MenTaLguY.

_why