< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事（スレッド移動）
N :次の記事（スレッド移動）
|<:前のスレッド
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
Issue #14069 has been updated by jwmittag (Jrg W Mittag).
*Is* that actually guaranteed by the specification? Can you point to any specification or documentation or official statement by the core team that supports your assertion that sets are insertion-ordered?
----------------------------------------
Bug #14069: Document order of elements in Set
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14069#change-69394
* Author: abotalov (Andrei Botalov)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.4
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Hash enumerates values in the insertion order.
Set is built on Hash so it does the same.
However, this is currently believed to be a not documented implementation detail. See:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/14468621/841064
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10361250/does-set-in-ruby-always-preserve-insertion-order#comment13351258_10361275
https://spin.atomicobject.com/2012/09/04/when-is-a-set-better-than-an-array-in-ruby/
I think it would be better to explicitly document that Set class enumerates keys in the insertion order.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>