Issue #14170 has been reported by aycabta (aycabta .).

----------------------------------------
Feature #14170: Add allbits?, anybits and nobits? to Ripper::Lexer::State
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14170

* Author: aycabta (aycabta .)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
@nobu added Ripper::Lexer::State at @60665
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/60665/diff/ext/ripper/lib/ripper/lexer.rb
and I think it's necessary for RDoc, I commented it at ruby-core:84111.
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/84111

aycabta (aycabta .) wrote:
> In Ruby 2.5, Ripper::Lexer::State is introduced:
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/60945/entry/ext/ripper/lib/ripper/lexer.rb#L49
> 
> It is for lex_state of parse.y, and has #& and #| for bit operations with lex_state_bits:
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/60945/entry/parse.y#L78
> 
> RDoc uses it:
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/60945/entry/lib/rdoc/parser/ripper_state_lex.rb#L321
> 
> If Integer#allbit? is implemented at 2.5, it's good for Ripper::Lexer::State and I'll use it for RDoc on 2.5.

I add allbits?, anybits and nobits? to Ripper::Lexer::State by the attached patch.

---Files--------------------------------
ripper_lexer_state_bits.patch (579 Bytes)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>