Greg.mpls / gmail.com wrote: > Thanks. I tested 60211. My local build passed, Travis passed, and Appveyor passed. Thanks for your help with testing this! > Now maybe I can finally write the code to run a Webrick SSL server locally. I normally use Puma or Thin... > > > I've considered it, but it requires accounting for total time spent in case we need to call accept_nonblock multiple times; so it's extra math + logic which I don't want... > > I'm a math type, but I realized that also... > > If you ever have any code you need tested on Windows, feel free to contact me. Sure, at least off the top of my head, there's at least auto-Fiber aka Thriber: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618 and more GVL release points for file.c and dir.c. Most of the current work pretty naively done but future optimizations may be more aggressive and I am likely to introduce bugs in dir.c around UTF-8 path name normalization: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13996 Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>