On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

> On Jul 18, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> 
> > my assumption was false and the existing comments would be picked up
> > anyway.  They just didn't show up on ruby-doc.org yet, the other reason
> > I thought I needed to change this.
> 
> Probably because the file isn't listed in the .document files for 1.8.4.  To
> see if it exists you should make install-doc and check ri.

"Nothing known about Tuplespace".  OK. 
> 
> > I'll be content either way, it depends on the percieved value of stylistic
> > consitency.
> 
> resolv.rb contains ## as well.  I don't believe there is a consistent style
> right now.

OK. Sorry for the noise then.  Thank you.  

Is the patch below the right thing to do about .document files?

        Hugh

--- ./lib/rss/maker/.document.orig	2006-07-18 18:29:01.674131000 +0100
+++ ./lib/rss/maker/.document	2006-07-18 18:29:34.611188000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+
+# Eventually, we hope to see...
+# *.rb
+
+# But for now
+
+0.9.rb
+1.0.rb
+2.0.rb
+base.rb
+content.rb
+dublincore.rb
+image.rb
+syndication.rb
+taxonomy.rb
+trackback.rb
--- ./lib/rss/.document.orig	2006-07-18 18:26:28.547381000 +0100
+++ ./lib/rss/.document	2006-07-18 18:28:02.608539000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+
+# Eventually, we hope to see...
+# *.rb
+
+# But for now
+
+0.9.rb
+1.0.rb
+2.0.rb
+content.rb
+converter.rb
+dublincore.rb
+image.rb
+maker
+maker.rb
+parser.rb
+parser.rb.orig
+rexmlparser.rb
+rss.rb
+syndication.rb
+taxonomy.rb
+trackback.rb
+utils.rb
+utils.rb.orig
+xml-stylesheet.rb
+xmlparser.rb
+xmlscanner.rb
--- ./lib/.document.orig	2006-07-13 20:07:19.000000000 +0100
+++ ./lib/.document	2006-07-18 18:25:55.824691000 +0100
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
 pstore.rb
 rational.rb
 rinda
+rss
+rss.rb
 set.rb
 shellwords.rb
 singleton.rb
>