On Jul 18, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jan Svitok wrote:
>
>> This is a cosmetic patch, and the last mentioned comment wasn't worth
>> the cosmetics as it is a stub.
>
> I've just tested my assumption that rdoc needs no blank lines between
> the comment and the doc, which is why I removed them.  It turns out
> my assumption was false and the existing comments would be picked up
> anyway.  They just didn't show up on ruby-doc.org yet, the other  
> reason
> I thought I needed to change this.

Probably because the file isn't listed in the .document files for  
1.8.4.  To see if it exists you should make install-doc and check ri.

>>
>> That said, it's another question whether it should be committed or  
>> not...
>
> I'll be content either way, it depends on the percieved value of  
> stylistic
> consitency.

resolv.rb contains ## as well.  I don't believe there is a consistent  
style right now.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com