On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:
>>> .
>> `Fiber.scheduler.add_auto_fiber{ ... }` (naming is not fixed) (operation
>> for scheduler) is my first idea.
> Too verbose, I think.  If I want to type more, I would not be
> using Ruby :)   How about adding kwarg to Fiber.new?

This design introduce new aspect: can we make schedulers per a thread?

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>