SASADA Koichi <ko1 / atdot.net> wrote:
> On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:
> > Yes. I'm thinking to introduce new constructor like ScheduledFiber.new
> > or something like that (maybe that name is not suitable, too). I believe
> > we shouldn't change the behavior just after creation.
> 
> `Fiber.scheduler.add_auto_fiber{ ... }` (naming is not fixed) (operation
> for scheduler) is my first idea.

Too verbose, I think.  If I want to type more, I would not be
using Ruby :)   How about adding kwarg to Fiber.new?

	Fiber.new(auto: true) { ... }

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>