------=_Part_15279_15503604.1150389875536
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thank you for the clarification. I for one would love to see green or m:n
threading in YARV as well as continuations, but from my work on JRuby I can
appreciate the complexity of the problem. A Ruby 2.0 with pure native
threading and no continuations would also make our implementation job much
easier, since Java supports neither green threads nor stack manipulation.

On 6/15/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Ruby Kaigi date confusion"
>     on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:24:39 +0900, "Charles O Nutter"
>     <headius / headius.com> writes:
>
> |- Ruby 1.9.1 with YARV will support only native threads, not green
> |- threads? YARV will not support continuations? Ruby 1.9.1 with YARV
> |- will (perhaps, probably, likely) be released what
> |month of what year? "next Christmas" for me would be December 2006
> |timeframe. December 2007 seems to be a very long time away,
> |especially for setting any kind of release date.
>
> (1) Yes, YARV will support only native threads, unless someone persuade
>     ko1 to implement it.  Maybe we need someone to pay him to do so.
>
> (2) No.  ko1 has already programmed basic hooks to implement
>     continuation.  But, unless someone pays, its implementation still
>     has low priority.
>
> (3) 1.9.1 will be released by Christmas 2007 (not 2006).  I know it's
>     long time away.  Hopefully earlier, but we cannot hope much
>     considering how much things need to be done before releasing, and
>     past long period of slow progression.
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>


-- 
Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
JRuby Developer @ jruby.sourceforge.net
Application Architect @ www.ventera.com

------=_Part_15279_15503604.1150389875536--