normalperson / yhbt.net wrote:
> This generates a lot of garbage starting with Ruby 2.2 (r44471).

Btw, I was wrong about Ruby 2.2, this goes back to 2.0 (r34847).
On the plus side, that means fixing this bug brings us closer
to Ruby 3x3 goal! (because 2.0 is the basis of that comparison).

Otherwise, I about to suggest a backport to hurt performance
in 2.0 so 2.5 performance looks better ;>  I am a marketing genius!

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>