How about Socket#nbconnect and Socket#nbaccept?

On 5/15/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Nonblocking socket-connect"
>     on Tue, 16 May 2006 00:42:39 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10 / gmail.com> writes:
>
> |Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking
> |functions as an extension in my asynchronous-IO framework. If you
> |decide it's best to leave nonblocking i/o out of the core, then people
> |will be able to get it if necessary through my "eventmachine" library.
>
> Note that I'm not against for non-blocking connect.  I just oppose to
> general purpose non-blocking attribute for IO.  Hint: name, name.
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>