On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:

> Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
>
>>  Also, while I guess Rubicon may be
>> part of the distribution someday, it isn't today, which means there
>> isn't a good place for the Test::Unit tests to go (yet).
>
> Is there a reason that rubicon couldn't be included? It seems pretty 
> stable (Nathaniel's recent patch notwithstanding).

I've talked to Matz about this (at rubyconf2002) and he was open to the 
idea. I probably need to push on this more and should finally get added 
to the core so I can do the work and just get it over with...

Objections? I'd be happy to take this on and help it evolve over to 
Test::Unit.