Issue #12671 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.


None-lambda doesn't mean that it never checks its arguments.
And if it's a lambda, it doesn't match the `arity` value.

As for the implementation detail, there is no room for arity in `ifunc`s.


----------------------------------------
Bug #12671: Hash#to_proc result is not a lambda, but enforces arity
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12671#change-60075

* Author: Charles Nutter
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0p0 (2015-12-25 revision 53290) [x86_64-darwin14]
* Backport: 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
```
 $ ruby23 -e 'pr = {foo:1}.to_proc; puts pr.lambda?; pr.call rescue puts $!; pr.call(1, 2) rescue puts $!'
false
wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1)
wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 1)
```

I believe it should be marked as a lambda, since it enforces arity.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>