pat / freelancing-gods.com wrote:
>
>> Why fix what isn't broken?
> 
> It may not be broken for you - does that mean it's not broken for others?

That's not how the burden of proof works, is it?


As a decade-long reader of ruby-core, I'd be interested to see examples of
said brokenness within the post archives.


Thanks,

Bill




Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>