Hi,

At Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:15:24 +0900,
Marcus Rueckert wrote in [ruby-core:07207]:
> > IMO, Ruby shouldn't be defining POSIX functions except on platforms
> > that don't support them, and probably not even then because of
> > possible conflicts. Look what happened with someone who tried to build
> > something with both Ruby and the APR recently and a definition of
> > pid_t instead of rb_pid_t.
> 
> yes. as mentioned on #ruby-lang we triggered it with compiling a koffice
> svn snapshot with ruby support.

Okey, anyway I committed a fix to check the presense of
eaccess(2) last night.

-- 
Nobu Nakada