> So, we should name as IBM037 for the realname, and cp037,
> ebcdic-cp-{us,ca,wt,nl} and csIBM037 for aliese.  Right?

The canonical name of Ruby's encoding should be Preferred MIME Name.

2015-12-15 9:28 GMT+09:00 U.NAKAMURA <usa / garbagecollect.jp>:
> Hi,
>
> In message "[ruby-core:72124] Re: [ruby-cvs:60264] duerst:r53112 (trunk): * enc/ebcdic.h: new dummy encoding EBCDIC-US"
>   on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:39:26 +0900, duerst / it.aoyama.ac.jp wrote:
>> > But I want to know where the name 'EBCDIC-US' came from.
>>
>> The name came from http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets/character-sets.xhtml, as MIB 2078.
>
> Oh, I've just missed it ;-(
>
>
>> > I guess this is the encoding that is named as 'IBM037' by IANA,
>> > and it's aliases are 'ebcdic-cp-us' and so on.
>>
>> Looking at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1345, the code conversion is indeed much closer to ebcdic-cp-us than to EBCDIC-US. So using EBCDIC-US is definitely wrong. Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Thank you for invesgating!
>
> So, we should name as IBM037 for the realname, and cp037,
> ebcdic-cp-{us,ca,wt,nl} and csIBM037 for aliese.  Right?
>
>
> Regards,
> --
> U.Nakamaura <usa / garbagecollect.jp>
>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse / airemix.jp>