Issue #11762 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

Status changed from Open to Rejected

I believe `dig` should only ignore nil receiver as its description.
Hiding argument/type error is not a good idea, I think.

Matz.


----------------------------------------
Bug #11762: Array#dig can raise TypeError: no implicit conversion of Symbol/String into Integer
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11762#change-55280

* Author: Colin Kelley
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
* ruby -v: 2.3.0-preview1
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
If you try to `dig` in an Array using a symbol or string, a `TypeError` exception will be raised:

irb> ['zero', 'one', 'two'].dig(:first)
TypeError: no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer
    from (irb):1:in `dig'
    from (irb):1

I think it should return `nil` in this case.  The most typical use case for `dig` is to dig through parsed JSON and either find the result we expected or else `nil`.  Wouldn't it defeat the purpose of `dig` if we had to wrap calls to it in a `rescue` to handle the case that an Array was present where we expected a Hash?

Can we clarify the desired behavior for this case, then update the documentation and tests to reflect that?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/