Issue #11717 has been updated by Matthew Kerwin.


Victor Shepelev wrote:
> 
> **Naming**
> 
> * it is similar enough to `tap`;
> * it is specific enough to not be used widely in some popular library (or isn't it?);
> * mnemonic is "do something and trap (catch) the value".
> 
> WDYT?

"trap" already means "trap a signal", it comes from long-standing Unix terminology; see [Signal#trap](http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.2.0/Signal.html#method-c-trap)

----------------------------------------
Feature #11717: Object#trap -- pass object to block and return result
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11717#change-54978

* Author: Victor Shepelev
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
----------------------------------------
`Object#trap` can be thought as useful counterpart for `Object#tap`: like tap, it passes object to the block; **unlike** tap, it returns results of the block, not object itself.

**Rationale**

`#trap` could allow to gracefully chain processing of objects, which isn't `Enumerable`, therefore enforcing "functional" style in Ruby (which considered good).

**Use case**

~~~
# Assume we grab some resource from web:
SomeWebClient.get('http://some/url', param1: 'value1', param2: 'value2').body

# And now, the body of response is JSON, and we want it parsed. How to express it?

# Option 1: wrap:
JSON.parse(SomeWebClient.get('http://some/url', param1: 'value1', param2: 'value2').body)
# Downside: messy parenthesis, and need to jump back and forth to understand the meaning

# Option 2: intermediate variable:
s = SomeWebClient.get('http://some/url', param1: 'value1', param2: 'value2').body
JSON.parse(s)
# Downside: intermediate variable is not elegant

# Option 3: monkey-patch (or refine)
SomeWebClient.get('http://some/url', param1: 'value1', param2: 'value2').body.from_json
# Downside: monkey-patching is a last resort; also, your classes should be already patched when you stuck with this case

# Option 4 (proposed): trap
SomeWebClient.get('http://some/url', param1: 'value1', param2: 'value2').body.
  trap{|s| JSON.parse(s)} # => parsed JSON
~~~

And when you are thinking with code, experimenting with code (especially in irb, but in editor too), only last option is "natural" river of thoughts: do this, then do that (extract data from web, then parse it).

**Naming**

* it is similar enough to `tap`;
* it is specific enough to not be used widely in some popular library (or isn't it?);
* mnemonic is "do something and trap (catch) the value".

WDYT?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/