Issue #10845 has been updated by Tsuyoshi Sawada.


>Ricky

Methods that modify the receiver and return the receiver would have to return the exact same object, which means that the class is the same.

----------------------------------------
Bug #10845: Subclassing String
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10845#change-51468

* Author: Tsuyoshi Sawada
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: 2.2
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
If I make a subclass of `String`, the method `*` returns an instance of that class.

~~~ruby
class MyString < String
end

MyString.new("foo").*(2).class #=> MyString
~~~

This is different from other similar operations like `+` and `%`, which return a `String` instance.

~~~ruby
MyString.new("foo").+("bar").class #=> String
MyString.new("%{foo}").+(foo: "bar").class #=> String
~~~

I don't see clear reason why `*` is to be different from `+` and `%`, and thought that perhaps either the behaviour with `*` is a bug, or the behaviour with `+` and `%` is a bug.

Or, is a reason why they are different?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/