Hi,

In message "[ruby-core:67555] Re: [ruby-cvs:56375] usa:r49225 (trunk): * test/ruby/test_numeric.rb (TestNumeric#test_coerce): fixed wrong message."
    on Jan.13,2015 06:30:25, <normalperson / yhbt.net> wrote:
> Oops, r49225 is a 64-bit specific change and my original r49224
> was only tested on 32-bit.

Oh, flonum...


> How about making error messages consistent across platforms?

Agree.
But, shouldn't we show the value instead of the class name?
About a value which can be expressed as a literal, showing the value
itself is more helpful than showing the class, in my opinion.


Regards,
-- 
U.Nakamura <usa / garbagecollect.jp>