On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Stefan Kaes wrote:

> Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > An old RCR of mine proposed making "end" implicit just before a closing
> > parens. It was rejected in little time. 
> Rightly so.

Why? it would've gotten rid of superfluous keywords.

> But what kind of answer is this? You don't like the way things are now so go
> take a hike?

Well, I was mistaken on what you call superfluous. I don't have *your* 
definition of superfluous though.

____________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montr?al QC Canada