< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事（自分と同じ返事先を持つ）
N :次の記事（自分と同じ返事先を持つ）
|<:スレッドの先頭
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
Hi,
At Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:28:36 +0900,
Daniel Berger wrote in [ruby-core:06691]:
> > > If there aren't any hard links on Win9X, all I can
> > > think of is to compare the same file:
> >
> > AFAIK, Win9X family don't support NTFS and others, which is
> > required for hard links and reparse points. The only way I
> > thought of is to compare expanded pathes.
>
> raise NotImplementedError unless NTFS
Why unless NTFS? Shouldn't test(?-, f, f) return true on all
platforms and all file systems?
> Stop coddling the Windows 9x crowd. It's dead. Do
> you really want to have to maintain this code base in
> the future?
The previous patch is not only for Win9X. Indeed, I agree it
would be dead platform for *development*, but still there are
some users of other DOSISH systems too.
As for Win9X, when we'll bury it, we would have to clean
win32/win32.c up first.
--
Nobu Nakada