Issue #10344 has been updated by Yura Sokolov.


 > At least, such feature should be located at ext/fiber.
 
 even if ext/fiber it is still should be implemented in C .
 
 > I'm afraid that introducing such feature increases complexity of Fiber.
 
 Not too much. Look at the patch: it uses same hook as rb_fiber_terminate.
 
 By the way, why Thread has this feature?
 http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-2.1.3/Thread.html#method-i-raise
 And why Fiber hasn't? In fact, it is strange that this feature still not
 presented, cause it is expected to exists.
 
 
 2014-10-16 8:41 GMT+04:00 <ko1 / atdot.net>:
 
 > Issue #10344 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
 >
 >
 >  On 2014/10/12 1:28, Knut.Franke / gmx.de wrote:
 >  > For some more sophisticated examples, see
 > https://github.com/nome/coroutines. The library does work with vanilla
 > Ruby, but the patch improves performance.
 >  >
 >  > Also, similar code can be simplified by using Fiber#raise. Compare e.g.
 > the two implementation of Consumer::Yielder#await at
 >  > https://github.com/nome/coroutines/blob/master/lib/coroutines/base.rb
 >
 >  I understand this feature helps some libraries. But I can't understand
 >  why it is important.
 >
 >  I'm afraid that introducing such feature increases complexity of Fiber.
 >  Basically, I want to recommend strongly that using Fiber as
 >  semi-croutine, ristricted feature.
 >
 >  At least, such feature should be located at ext/fiber.
 >
 >  --
 >  // SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net
 >
 > ----------------------------------------
 > Feature #10344: [PATCH] Implement Fiber#raise
 > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10344#change-49483
 >
 > * Author: Knut Franke
 > * Status: Open
 > * Priority: Normal
 > * Assignee:
 > * Category:
 > * Target version:
 > ----------------------------------------
 > While it is possible to implement this in pure Ruby (by wrapping
 > Fiber.yield and Fiber#resume), this feels like a low-level feature that
 > ought to be provided out of the box. Also, the C implementation is more
 > straight-forward, and more efficient. Unfortunately, it is not quite
 > possible to implement this as a C extension module (without resorting to
 > wrappers again); cf. the change to make_passing_arg().
 >
 > Example usage:
 >
 > ~~~
 > fib = Fiber.new do
 >   counter = 0
 >   loop { counter += Fiber.yield }
 >   counter
 > end
 > fib.resume
 > fib.resume 10
 > fib.resume 100
 > fib.raise StopIteration # => 110
 > ~~~
 >
 > ---Files--------------------------------
 > 0001-Implement-Fiber-raise.patch (4.12 KB)
 >
 >
 > --
 > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 >

----------------------------------------
Feature #10344: [PATCH] Implement Fiber#raise
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10344#change-49517

* Author: Knut Franke
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
While it is possible to implement this in pure Ruby (by wrapping Fiber.yield and Fiber#resume), this feels like a low-level feature that ought to be provided out of the box. Also, the C implementation is more straight-forward, and more efficient. Unfortunately, it is not quite possible to implement this as a C extension module (without resorting to wrappers again); cf. the change to make_passing_arg().

Example usage:

~~~
fib = Fiber.new do
  counter = 0
  loop { counter += Fiber.yield }
  counter
end
fib.resume
fib.resume 10
fib.resume 100
fib.raise StopIteration # => 110
~~~

---Files--------------------------------
0001-Implement-Fiber-raise.patch (4.12 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/