Issue #7549 has been updated by Martin Dürst.

Status changed from Open to Rejected

I just read a blog that said this issue was still open.
I might be slightly biased (see my comments above), but in order to avoid confusion, I'm closing this issue because the proposal is no longer activelyiscussed.
If somebody has a better proposal, they are always welcome to open another issue.

----------------------------------------
Feature #7549: A Ruby Design Process
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7549#change-49105

* Author: Brian Shirai
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
Matz,

At RubyConf 2012, I gave a talk about a design process for Ruby (http://www.confreaks.com/videos/1278-rubyconf2012-toward-a-design-for-ruby). So far, over 12,000 people have viewed that talk. I think it is reasonable to say that many people are concerned about and interested in a design process for Ruby.

On Monday, we had an IRC meeting of Ruby implementers. Most of the points in my proposal were discussed but I'm concerned that a lot of confusion remains.

I have written a post that describes a Ruby design process and hopefully clarifies points that people found confusing:

http://brixen.io/2012/12/11/a-ruby-design-process

I would like to propose this process for making changes to Ruby. I am goingo put a summary of the process at http://rubyspec.org/design and ask for people who support the process to submit their signature. I'd like to request that you consider the response from the community for my proposal.

Thank you,
Brian




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/