On Oct 30, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

> wow.  nice work james!

Thanks.

> i'd hate to have to fix that expression

I've worked with it enough now I think I even understand it, as scary  
as that sounds.  ;)

> but it's hard to to argue with faster code that's much shorter too

I agree.  No offense intended, but CSV is just a touch over  
complicated, in my opinion.

> one thing i was thinking was that this might best be plugged in to  
> the stdlib as
>
>   CSV::fast_parse
>
> which would avoid all compatibilty issues and test case issues...  
> it could
> just drop right in.

Give me some time and I'll see if I can put something together we can  
look at...

James Edward Gray II