Hi,

At Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:37:22 +0900,
Matt Armstrong wrote:
> > That is "inherited" will be called after subclass is defined.
> > How should we describe this?
> 
> I tried to explain simply (attached as patch against current
> doc/NEWS).

Thank you.

> Also, does this change log of yours change any behavior?  This is
> where I discovered the "inherited" method in the first place -- I see
> now the new timing of "inherited" was done by matz later.

This changed the behavior at exception while class definition,
the class name would be registered or not.  I don't guess it'll
very concern users.

> @@ -1129,12 +1129,20 @@
>  }
>  
>  static VALUE
> -rb_reg_match_m(re, str)
> -    VALUE re, str;
> +rb_reg_match_m(argc, argv, re)

Do you like it? :-)

-- 
Nobu Nakada