(2014/07/14 16:12), Eric Wong wrote:
> OK, r46811 (I also made trivial commit r46813 to shrink catch entry)

Thanks.

> What should we do about rb_iseq_build_for_ruby2cext?  I think it is
> broken, now (as is anything else which might depend on iseq internals).

It is only for experimental feature.

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net