Issue #9660 has been updated by Eric Wong.


 normalperson / yhbt.net wrote:
 >  e / zzak.io wrote:
 >  > I like the name ruby-unit, in this case we should also consider
 >  > changing the namespaces to match (ie: RubyUnit)
 >  
 >  Might as well use Minitest:: at that point, right?
 
 Nevermind, there's a lot of old assertions which Minitest drops.
 Maybe we can do it long term.

----------------------------------------
Bug #9660: test/unit, minitest & bundler
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9660#change-46025

* Author: Marc-Andre Lafortune
* Status: Open
* Priority: High
* Assignee: Shota Fukumori
* Category: lib
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: r45033
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
test/unit now calls `gem 'minitest'`, but this will create regressions for anyone using `bundler`.

For example, create an empty `Gemfile` and try `bundle exec ruby -e "require 'test/unit'"`

You get an error:

    .rvm/gems/ruby-head@global/gems/bundler-1.5.3/lib/bundler/rubygems_integration.rb:240:in `block in replace_gem': minitest is not part of the bundle. Add it to Gemfile. (Gem::LoadError)


See: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/da61291a25faae95f33de6756b2eaa4804d5ef2b#commitcomment-5761129



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/