Issue #9660 has been updated by Eric Wong. normalperson / yhbt.net wrote: > e / zzak.io wrote: > > I like the name ruby-unit, in this case we should also consider > > changing the namespaces to match (ie: RubyUnit) > > Might as well use Minitest:: at that point, right? Nevermind, there's a lot of old assertions which Minitest drops. Maybe we can do it long term. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9660: test/unit, minitest & bundler https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9660#change-46025 * Author: Marc-Andre Lafortune * Status: Open * Priority: High * Assignee: Shota Fukumori * Category: lib * Target version: current: 2.2.0 * ruby -v: r45033 * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- test/unit now calls `gem 'minitest'`, but this will create regressions for anyone using `bundler`. For example, create an empty `Gemfile` and try `bundle exec ruby -e "require 'test/unit'"` You get an error: .rvm/gems/ruby-head@global/gems/bundler-1.5.3/lib/bundler/rubygems_integration.rb:240:in `block in replace_gem': minitest is not part of the bundle. Add it to Gemfile. (Gem::LoadError) See: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/da61291a25faae95f33de6756b2eaa4804d5ef2b#commitcomment-5761129 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/