On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts / uniserve.com> wrote:
> Quoting halostatue / gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:02:07AM +0900:
> > On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire / gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've added namespaces to require. Works like this:
> >
> > Two things. 1. I don't see any particular reason for this. It's neat,
>
> The point is that gems fundamentally changes the way require works.

Indeed.  That's the the other half my inquiry. Despite what anyone
might think of my particular namespace idea, RubyGems does raise such
issue.

T.