SASADA Koichi <ko1 / atdot.net> wrote:
> (2014/01/03 12:49), Eric Wong wrote:
> > Btw, I took some time to work on this further.  Only _very_ lightly
> > tested (make check passes)
> 
> What the difference between charliesome/tmm1's patch?
> (just curious, I want to know)

Mine replaces nd_lit in node directly (seems OK, since other
rb_fstring uses do that).  I also implement aref, not just aset.

This is my first time working in compile.c and I'm not familiar with
this code at all, but it still seems to be still working :)
Other than my trivial loop, I haven't tested performance.