On 9/22/05, Florian Gro<florgro / gmail.com> wrote:
> TRANS wrote:
>
> >   > ruby t1.rb
> >
> > So t1.rb is double loading. A bug? I would hope it's okay for libs to
> > be mutually dependent.
>
> It is probably because t1.rb is not loaded as a library the first time.
> I'm not sure if it is to be considered a bug.

hmm... is there some reason that the currently loading file should not
be recorded as required?

I've simplified the occurance.

t1.rb:

  p "here1"
  require 't1'

produces

  "here1"
  "here1"

T.