On 2013/11/11 1:47, Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) wrote:

> i think in most cases we want something like ary[1..-1].each  but wouldnt it be better if we have an each method like
>
> each_only(1..-1) {}

#each currently doesn't have arguments. So this could even be

each(1..-1) {}

Regards,   Martin.

> that does that for us without making an new array?